• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Americans are big on appearances. Gotta seem religious. Gotta seem rich. Gotta seem happy. Gotta seem free.

    Seem

  • descartador@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    16 hours ago

    crazy how people in brazil used to look up to American living standards, but it turns out americans have more inequality, violence, worse education, health system, worse food, and the list goes on

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I swear the biggest lie is that America is somehow a better country because it has houses that are expensive and fast food so that it can import what essentially accounts to slave labor when they finally come over excited to work for lower wages and live in cramped housing without their social networks other than the other slave laborers.

      Its probably how we make it how people not climbing financially can still feel superior. No one has to pay the debt if you can keep getting new people on a lower rung.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    The US is big on wealth inequality, like most third-world countries. Yeah, lots of people are broke, but lots of people are also making 200k/year. Overall we’re definitely struggling, but that doesn’t mean everyone is struggling.

    Lemmy also leans both older and into the tech demographic, which tend to be higher paid.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Cries in near minimum wage UK tech work. The only upside is minimum wage is actually pretty good

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, close to 6% of the population is making unfathomable amounts of money and the crazy thing is that just 6% of the population is still 20 Million people. You could replace the entire population of Tokyo with American millionaires and still have more to spare to claim New York too.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          True but I think the rich are about 10% so I think that’s number should be closer to like 30-35m

          Either way, US has a mega city or canada sized country of pure high income and or asset owner.

          These people are true benefecies of the empire. They essentially enforce regime orthodoxy on political level while providing their professional services to the owner class. For this they are permitted to thrive, while the rest of working class is being driven into more poverty with each generation.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah but the tokyo metro area is an insanely large sprawl only rivaled by the tristate area of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut.
          I kinda meant just the dense city lines of both which is still an insane amount.
          That entire tristate area is also 20 million people so its more people than that that are wealthy enough to think the empire as a truly good thing.

  • zululove@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    America is a third world occupied country but everybody is in denial, obese and wearing nice clothes 😌

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Who’s pretending?

    We’re all broke. Unless you’re a boomer trying to sell a $0.50 house you bought in the 50s you paid for on a gas station cashier salary. They’re ok for the moment. But even a lot of them are going broke now too. Highest demographic of newly homeless last I heard.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They often are, yes. I’m not sure exactly what “in debt” means to OP. But, when I use it like this I generally mean “negative net worth” not “carrying a line of credit”.

      I currently have a balance on a CC, but I don’t consider myself in debt, because it’s smaller than my checking account balance, and that’s smaller than my investment account balance, and that’s smaller than my retirement account balance.

      I don’t own a home, but I also didn’t really consider myself “in debt” when I purchased my current car.


      Oddly enough I would say I am “in debt to” my CC company, because I do owe money to them and they do not owe money to me. The “to X” part of the phrase restricts my consideration to just two-party financial relationship, in my mind. When you leave off the “to X”, I consider all the financial relationship I have and (roughly) sum over them.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Same here, funny carry a balance, but at least for a couple of weeks I owe my credit card company.

        Simply because if I use my debit card, i get nothing. Use my credit card and I get 2 to 3 percent off…

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, I pay it off about twice a month, but usually between the day I schedule a payment and the day it arrives I’ve used the card again, so it’s rare for me to have a zero (or negative!) balance.

          I do like the CC rewards, but they get that my “shorting” / charging the merchant. So, if the merchant is part of your community, try to avoid involving a CC processor by paying in cash. (I think cash is a pain to deal with, so my in-built preference is for some sort of card / phone payment system.)

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s part of our culture. It dates back to when America was new. Plantation owners wanted to pretend we had a rich and powerful economy and history and culture. They made everything pristine and gaudy and exp wove looking but there was no substance. Look at the architectural decisions made in plantation houses and how the elements are still used in homes today.

    We pretend we are better than we really are.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m guessing not admitting your finances are shit is pretty universal, no need to pick on 'Murica.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      There is some truth to what you’re saying but the USA are special about it. It’s like, they try to (badly) act as if they had more than enough money but it’s obvious they’re struggling badly. Like a functional addict thinking he’s hiding it well but in fact everyone knows and there’s a shared social discomfort in the charade

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    Broke, poor, and in debt are three different things.

    Broke just means no cash on hand. You can have tons of cash flow and assets but at the moment you are lacking liquidity to pay cash for things. You may or may not have debt. You might have just blown all your cash on a big purchase.

    Poor means you have little and earn little and can do little. Debt is often a factor here but you can be poor and not in debt.

    People in debt owe money. They might not be struggling at all. Sometimes rich people borrow money because it costs them less than the interest they receive on the cash they have. Or it could be the opposite, it could be crippling every aspect of their lives.

    Americans carry a lot of debt on average. My only debit is my mortgage plus the last two weeks of credit card spending. I pay off my card in full every month. I only use the credit card because it offers purchase protection and I get rewards. Not all debt is bad debt, but a lot of it is.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I used to be comfortably poor with no debt. My income, expenses and living standards were low.

      Now earning a little over minimum wage and fucking hell life is easy, but largely because I was poor and just got used to not having things. I continue that now.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Once you learn how to live on very little money out of necessity, living comfortably within your means as your wages increase doesn’t feel like such a bad thing.

        And anyone who has been without a safety net understands that keeping a buffer in their bank account feels way better than splurging on impulsive luxuries.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          My buffer started at treat £2k as zero. As my wages went up I quickly started going over £5k and then £10k, didn’t even know how to spend it. So I didn’t spend it.

          Within a few years of saving like £5-10k a year I had enough for a pretty good deposit on a house, like 15% or so. The house we got wasn’t even at the higher end of what we could borrow. I don’t want to min/max wealth, I want to live comfortably, and there are allotments across the road from us.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    In debt doesn’t mean broke. People with a mortgage that they are easily paying off have debt. Millionaires and billionaires have millions and billions in debt. Debt itself isn’t bad. Debt can be good.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I would rather no debt, but I kinda need a house because it’s illegal to buy a field and live there in a yurt

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Come out to the country. Just make sure your field is outside city limits, and you’ll probably be fine living there, as long as your sewage doesn’t drain into a protected waterway. A 3-phase septic wouldn’t be too hard to put in, but it’s a lot easier if you’ll rent heavy machinery instead of shovels.

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Well, I would say you could immigrate to the U.S., but that’s a bad idea for a number of reasons, IMO.

            No countryside up in Scotland anymore?

            • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              There is countryside but you are not allowed to live on land without planning permission, I presume Scotland has a fairly similar system too.

    • P13@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The average American is living paycheck to paycheck with bad, high interest debt and killer monthly minimums. Many people roll their underwater car loan into a new underwater car loan. The housing market is taking a turn.

      People are mostly broke.

      • Alternativebarker39@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Based on statistical average, or based on your imagination?

        I get that we say this culturally, and it’s common. But it’s not that simple.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The point is that being in debt isn’t the same as being broke and living paycheque to paycheque. Rich people have note debt than broke people because banks etc are far more willing to give rich people debt since they can actually pay it back.

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just a small correction there: debt can never be good.

      But debt can be necessary, but that is only because some financial institutions have made it so, because many of them make their money from peoples debt.

      So they spread the myth that debt is good, despite the fact that the world would be a far better place without debt.

      • fakeplastic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I had $90k of mortgage debt that I could have paid off but chose not to because they were charging me 2.5% interest and I was getting 5% interest letting the money sit in a bank account. Debt was most certainly a good thing in that scenario.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Absolutely false. Debt is a tool. It’s a wealth multiplier.

        You can use tools incorrectly, and that can harm you. But used correctly, they can let you do things quicker and easier than you could have without them.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        No, debt can be good. If you’re making more money from an asset than the interest on the loan used to buy that asset, it’s good debt.