lad

If that’s a joke, it’s a good one. Otherwise, well, there are a lot of “this letter isn’t needed let’s throw it away,” in most cases it will not work as good as you think.

This quote from Linus is what I find inspiring hope of a future wider adoption or Rust:

Thanks. I decided to try to do the merge on my own, but failed. I came close, but it was good to have your example merge to see what I got wrong.

The pin_init becoming a crate of its own, but ‘pin::Pin’ being in the core crate ended up messing with my “monkey see, monkey do” approach to Rust merges.

I’ll learn eventually, in the meantime please do continue to give me example merges and I’ll use them as training wheels.

My girlfriend is gonna be mighty upset is she thinks I’m into that kinda thing. […] please change the image to something Gnome-related and/or trustworthy.

That’s an interesting takeaway from a DDoS issue

I’d say that trying to get Rust everywhere is just something that is done in the hope it will help the ecosystem mature faster. It’s a bit hard to compete with languages that are 30, 40, or over 50 years old

TBF, your previous post reads to me the opposite way, like ‘it is not enough of a hate site’. Also I would offer you to look at it as a Venn diagram, if something is a hate site and more, it is still a hate site, just with extra

They started replacing the default screenshot tool with snipping tool, but maybe it’s not the default to call it with PrtScr

Saving from source was in context of saving from Instagram, I find screenshooting Web pages less fitting than getting into the source of the page, albeit the former is simpler

Doesn’t that call the same snipping tool? Anyway, saving from source may preserve quality a bit better

My friends not in Scandinavia used to have slight fever for a couple of months before going to a doctor to find out it was pneumonia. I wonder, how Scandinavian doctors react to slight fever, not a bad fever, and if they send you back home then this an example of what’s wrong. Other than that it’s likely a good idea to try to make one’s body heal itself, if the immune system is not compromised

I was reading the comments expecting this movie to pop up. I only watched half, because it wasn’t interesting enough, but also want to re-watch because maybe I was just not ready or something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don’t think this operator is a real feature, tbh 😅

This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.

Wow what a marketing scum trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products

Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon

Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?

As per current psychology’s view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo

I’d say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it’s not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it’s language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we’re wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it’s just language all the way down.

Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn’t keep my hopes up

It is Minecraft enchanting table language: source

Not quite related to the topic, but I encountered several ‘books’ that can be replaced by several paragraphs of text, and this is almost as bad as making three hours video instruction where 30 seconds or a bit of text would suffice. I find it horrible that such ones are written at all

How lossy can it be until it’s not infringement? One-line summary of some book is also a lossy reproduction

Well, I’m in awe of their commitment to transparency now. Not sure if it is the sole reason, but still impressive