Because the only thing coming out of them is shit?

Smoking

So “international poor spelling” ?

Yeah, that’s assault of a minor.

Doesn’t China own a lot of USA assets that it could sell and cause all manner of mayhem with?

Seems to me that the USA is about to find out what it means to antagonise a country that isn’t known for blinking.

Google Automotive Services?

😂

It’s funny. When I first started, functional programming was going to be the next big thing. It bubbled along for a decade or so. I interviewed company founders about their functional software projects.

Nothing happened.

Sure there are a few, let’s call them niche, applications, but you just have to look around and see that object orientation made a bigger splash and even that is beginning to be evaluated.

Perhaps functional software will have its day in the limelight, but with the latest AI slop fad, it’s going to be a while.

I’ve been writing software for over 40 years and this is the first I have ever heard of this. Much appreciated.

I’m still trying to grok it, but for anyone playing, here’s where I started:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/310974/what-is-tail-call-optimization#310980

Minority Report … what could possibly go wrong?

Fortunately you’re likely to run out of memory or swap space and it will stop all by itself 😇

Arguing about which browser does not make much sense to me because ultimately to render HTML with CSS in the way that the designer expected is the whole reason you need CSS.

ePub is interesting, but the functionality supported in the HTML is limited, as is CSS support.

You make an interesting point about JavaScript, but in my experience, the use of it is increasing, not decreasing.

I never said that Firefox, Chrome or Safari was required, there are plenty of light(er) weight browsers around, there’s even a Wikipedia page about it:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_lightweight_web_browsers

My point stands, use a browser.

A browser is specifically designed for rendering HTML and does it better than anything else.

However, if you must, you can use something like pandoc to convert the HTML to something else, like a PDF or an Office document.

An alternative is to use a text only browser like lynx.

The ides that a browser is overkill is only true if you don’t already have one installed and only if you’re happy to put up with half baked rendering.

So … use a browser.

Google Lens says:

Which one of these commands is correct?

A sed -e 's/\b(\w+)\b/echo \1 | rev/g' file.txt

B: sed 's/b\w+\b/echo & | rev/ge' file.txt

Csed -e 's/(\w+)/$(echo \1 | rev)/g' file.txt

D: sed 's/([a-zA-Z]\+\)/\n&\n/g; s/\n\(\)\(.*\)\(\)\n/\3\2\1/g; s/\n//g' file.tx

It’s interesting that Google doesn’t even get all the text. I had to manually extend the selection and that still misses the “t” on the end of answer D, munches C and more alarmingly changes the case for “-E”.

It’s not just me being tempted … right?

A right to privacy is not at all the same as the right to know, in many cases it’s the exact opposite.

I’ve never used the tool, but I’m guessing that your Oracle database can create an SQL dump of its schema which presumably is how this tool ingests a database to chart.

Do you?

Where is this right enshrined?

I’m asking because you seem to believe that such a right exists, where I’m observing that the political leadership across the planet seems to be heading in the opposite direction at an alarming rate.

Props for a shitpost with such depth of depravity, especially since even a single response here will increase entropy more than you getting up and turning the TV on multiple times a day for the rest of your life.

And here’s the kicker, that pales into insignificance when compared with watching a twelve hour video.

Every airport accepting commercial flights has an IATA code. You should be able to search using the code as a destination in every (partner) airline that services that airport.

https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search