troed

It’s a list from 2021 and as a cybersec researcher and Jellyfin user I didn’t see anything that would make me say “do not expose Jellyfin to the Internet”.

That’s not to say there might be something not listed, or some exploit chain using parts of this list, but at least it’s not something that has been abused over the last four years if so.

In Sweden a single Volkswagen EV model (ID.7) now sells as much as all the Tesla models together.

In the sense that it does use more of the fuel, like a breeder reactor, that’s good. We need to stop claiming 95% good fuel to be “waste” that needs to be stored for a long time and instead just use it all up.

I don’t get it. They’re 17. They’re not kids. Wikipedia tells me the age of consent in the US varies from 13 to 17 (depending on age difference and if it’s a person in authority) which is actually partly lower than in Sweden (15).

You seem to willingly uphold something you actually don’t believe in, even when just asked for your opinion. Why?

Why is it up to you whether they have sex or not? Aren’t they their own individuals? What’s the age of consent where you reside?

(I’m Swedish and your views sound completely unhinged coming from my cultural background)

Don’t know about “art”, but I use it sometimes to generate contextual imagery for blog posts and videos. I would’ve never hired an artist so the only real difference is that it looks a lot better than when I used to try to draw something myself.

No, Telegram is a Russia controlled service not using encryption at all unless you specifically turn it on - and never for groups.

Being Russia controlled they put out a lot of disinfo and so way too many people and news outlets still include it in the “secure messaging” category.

Signal

Matrix

Those are your two choices. Signal is centralized, Matrix is federated.

Telegram is not a secure messaging app.

Just start up your own instance at a suitable domain name. “computerexcellencetrainingcourses.com” or something.

Nice exploit chain!

Why is your VPN jump box better than an SSH jump box?

There’s no difference to the work I need to do to secure an open SSHd vs an open WireGuard server. None.

Yes I harden, and penetrate, systems for a living. If your systems need remote access there is no standard (neither in fintech or military) that classifies SSHd as being “worse” than a VPN.

Nuclear is cheaper than your average electricity cost.

I know because I’m Swedish and you use us as your cheap electricity.

Yeah I don’t do security via obscurity :D I agree you need to keep your Internet facing services up to date.

(No need to educate me on Wireguard, I use it. My day job is slightly relevant to the discussion)

Why would a Swedish ISP care? I’ve run servers from home since I first connected up in … 1996. I’ve had a lot of different ISPs during that time, although nowadays I always choose Bahnhof because of them fighting the good fights.

That attack vector is exactly the same towards a VPN.

It’s perfectly safe to run SSH on port 22 towards the open Internet with public key authentication only.

Which distro allows root to login via SSH?

I was macOS (desktop) and Linux (servers), but over time it just became cumbersome to cater to the - while Unix - different environment on the Macs all the time. I’ve now converted over the last Macbook Pro to Linux but what I really want is a Linux distribution really made specifically for the Macs and making full use of their somewhat special hardware.

If you’re more at home with macOS then this doesn’t apply to you of course :) A lot of the software I use is from the open source community where Mac gets supported because it’s possible to compile for it but it’s always an afterthought.

(Servers? Yeah that might surprise people - but the performance of Apple Silicon is really very interesting for a lot of tasks where you need “GPU-speedup” without installing a full GPU)