Usually the goal when funding stuff like this is to buy some influence to control major decisions. I wouldn’t put it beyond an independent foundation, to take just one example, to drastically reduce the deadlines between confidential disclosure and public release where some government or corporate controlled organization might set some that are more made for the slow speed of large org bureaucracy.
It has been a lot longer since journalistic standards started their decline.
The entire infrastructure was changed towards cars within living memory. What makes you think the reverse isn’t possible or even likely in the next hundred years?
The relevant question here is if you are in Turkey because if you aren’t this is a much bigger deal than if you are.
Also, does “restricted access to your account for users” mean for all users or just for those in Turkey?
The reason why I was thinking it would utilities is that the big name brand social media stuff often pays to come pre-installed.
My guess would be that none of the big, well known brands are in the top ten and that those are instead useful utilities that almost everybody uses but rarely talks about.
I guess it is useful for the US’ love for avoiding the units everyone lese is using that they have a unit that represents a lifetime worth of flops, the Trump?
Isn’t the idea that if you advertise you will get more people looking at/downloading your app and therefore rank higher?
That is what advertising companies would like you to believe but the effect is nowhere near this drastic, otherwise they would be showing double-blind studies about the effectiveness of advertising to all their customers all the time.
But now with additional artificial misinformation and artificial nazi bots thrown in…oh wait, that is just X already.
It is the kind of asset that makes you appreciate what you had before you decided to replace it with a Tesla.
And then “accidentally” lose the opt-out setting every other update or so.
Open source is much less useful with AI though since you can neither inspect how it works exactly nor modify that one thing that bothers you about the current behavior.
The problem is that the picture does not represent what they want. They want aspects a, b and c from the picture while someone else looking at it might see aspects x, y and z. Pictures are an incredibly imprecise form of communication.
It is worse. People can’t even fix AI so it gets better at a task.
It does if you are used to sane languages instead of the implicit conversion nonsense C and the “dynamic” languages are doing
No, the problem is that even if people who consider themselves really important want this really, really hard that doesn’t change the reality that the technology doesn’t do what they want it to do.
I assume you meant to write “if you don’t have an account”
That is not the same thing though. Your version sounds like the laws accelerate enshittification where the original is about the laws stopping a reversal of the enshittification that already happened in the past.
They’re just too unreliable for any serious enterprise grade application
I wouldn’t go that far. They are perfectly capable of fucking up as badly as organizations with the “enterprise” warning label have for decades.
Maybe multiplying each driven distance by the number of owners? I wouldn’t put it beyond them if they code that crap with AI.