Oh. Ok

Did you manually add a shutterstock watermark?

I seriously read this in his voice. Almost scarily well too.

HdbaseT audio only?

Yeah. It’s my favorite at the moment, but it doesn’t seem well maintained

If Google wasn’t so blatantly malicious in their advertising practices then I would gladly pay for YouTube premium. However, their current business model of “take any and every bit of data on them to sell more product” is morally repugnant. Subsequently, I feel no shame in blocking ads and using invidious to avoid giving them even a cent of revenue.

I thought it was just a fun photo of a cat. It’s not worth being so upset over. Let people have their fun.

Regardless of the number of people involved in this conflict, nuclear escalation could only increase the number of deaths. There is no world in which atomic weapons solve this issue

Vivaldi browser just came out for iOS and has Adblock support. So does Firefox focus. Also, invidious/piped is always an option.

I’m not horny, but that raccoon looks super polite.

Have you actually seen the video? It’s mostly about the exaggerated media coverage surrounding the nonexistent NyQuil chicken “trend”

Sure, but saying it won’t work with Firefox at all is inaccurate. I hate this menu, but it’s incorrect to say it doesn’t give the option of using Firefox.

It opens Firefox. They’re complaining about nothing.

Is the background of the image just the google image results for “instagram logo”?

Do you have a source? The only notable investment of his I’m aware of is framework.

How is it even possible to use the wrong GPU when the correct one is in the same box. That makes it seem malicious rather than foolish.

Answering your question on the inconsistent back button, there are simply too many of them. Sometimes it is the small text link with an arrow in the top left corner, sometimes it is a built in app back button, and sometimes the text version sticks around during navigation for no reason until it is clicked accidentally and throws back to the previous app.

Wow, you weren’t kidding.

Your point is solid, but that level of polish on Apple products is only skin deep. For example, there are several missing features and issues with MacOS that have gone unaddressed for years.

• Window edge snapping is incredibly frustrating. Linux desktops and Microsoft Windows have had proper window snapping support for decades.

• The app uninstall process is inconsistent, with some apps remaining contained in the .app folder while others spill out all over the system.

• The recovery mode process for resetting an Intel-based Mac is incredibly tedious and time consuming.

However, MacOS isn’t the only Apple product with issues.

• WatchOS has an inconsistent and difficult to navigate UI. The bubble menu is inconsistent and difficult to navigate, and the list view requires that you sort by alphabetical when a “recently used” sort would be significantly more efficient.

• IOS doesn’t allow sideloading apps.

• TVOS is filled with ads for Apple’s premium services like AppleTV+

• IOS home screen icons cannot have blank space and must instead tile to the top of the screen.

• Methods for going back to what was previously onscreen are inconsistent in IOS.

• IOS browsers are required to use mobile Safari’s web engine.

However, this isn’t to say that Apple products are bad, simply to remind you that they do have flaws. Based on your wording of “bootleg os’s” I can’t quite tell what your referring to. Windows is the only OS I’m aware of other than MacOS that has heavy advertising, but your phrasing seems to place it in a different category altogether. Although if you are looking for a new OS to try I highly recommend looking into the many Linux distributions available. I recommend Linux Mint to beginners, since it is generally the simplest to use.

That makes sense. Vivaldi uses a chrome user agent most of the time, unless you use a Microsoft service, in which case it uses a Microsoft Edge user agent.