I think you’re right - women are also socialized to seek out social/interpersonal connections more than men; this is a big factor in why the suicide rate for elderly men tends to be significantly higher than for elderly women.

This doesn’t explain the 60 year olds but with the elderly (70+) women in my life, the vulnerability to misinformation is also an artifact of their comparatively poor levels of education. They were schooled with the expectation that they would be SAHMs.

Yeah I think a lot of the real mods left during the API debacle.

What’s left is fewer mod tools and less experienced moderators, a bad combination.

I agree with you, I just mean it’s hard for us to enforce it when we are being blocked by powers like the US etc.

Thanks, fantastic article, nice to get the BBC perspective on this as I wonder sometimes about The Irawaddy’s possibly being a bit optimistic.

Thanks, you just made it crystal clear to me how we get from here to full on Idiocracy.

This is the crux of it:

The ICC has 124 state parties, while the United Nations has 193 member states. This disparity makes clear the gap between what the ICC seeks to achieve – namely, universal accountability for international crimes – and what it can practically achieve when it lacks the support of implicated or nonaligned countries.

Yikes.

I had a conversation with Pi which tries for empathy. It was really weird because every now and again it did sound like it was interested in me or cared about me. Reminds me of that Philip K Dick story about the murder bots that look like wounded soldiers or lost children.

@007KeyLimePie welcome!

Discoverability takes a bit longer here. If you’re looking to add content, then alongside the usual directories it’s worth checking out the lists at https://kbin.social/magazines/collections

Moderation is transparent here.

Also, protip: if you’re in a thread where everyone is raging about “libs” or “the liberals,” on reddit that would indicate a conservative sub, but here there’s a 99% chance they are communists or anarchists.

I had a 3-month ban from a community once and had no idea until I did a mod log search on my own username about 6 months later.

Thinking back to how I could possibly have failed to even notice, I think it’s just that kbin still displays the comments of banned kbin users so I was probably still getting interactions through that.

If the US would withdraw protection the rest of the international community could probably make more meaningful interventions in the genocide.

I’ve noticed it too but I don’t think it’s only because of the exodus.

I think it’s also because by removing mod tools and opening the floodgates for bots, Reddit has enabled all kinds of vote manipulation and content manipulation by all the shill armies.

Everything from the Hasbara, the 50 centers, Putin’s troll farm, Musk’s troll farm, whatever Zucc runs that used to come and sealion me anytime I talked about facebook’s role in genocide … all those things have come into their full power now.

Really? That’s so interesting, and a bit disappointing.

I’m still on kbin so I can’t see downvotes from other instances, only our own. So most downvotes for me indicate actual spam.

No, it’s really not necessarily what it looks like at all, though you could be forgiven for thinking it. I think perhaps this is the difference between those who focus on this issue because they’re interested in Israel, versus those who focus on it mainly because they’re interested in human rights.

You could blindly drop a bomb quite literally anywhere

Blindly dropping bombs on densely populated areas is a war crime.

Yes, killing this many people this fast is a consequence of the choices the IDF is making. No, they are not inevitable choices.

For instance, in its entire war against Islamic State the US dropped just one 2,000lb bomb. Israel is dropping hundreds of them.

Roof knocking and leaflets are a fig leaf - a fiction with the aim of avoiding international condemnation, a bit like the peculiar interpretations of “occupying force” and international law we see from them.

I’ve seen footage of those leaflets raining down on innocent people in Gaza, the panic and despair. It’s not humanitarian at all. Ironically some of the people best equipped to get away in time are Hamas fighters, which is probably why the IDF uses “Where’s Daddy” to kill suspected Hamas leaders when they are at home.

continue with their plan

Israeli politicians and public figures have been pretty clear in their national discourse about what their plans are. I don’t think we need to speculate further than that.

This “warning them beforehand” fig leaf only works if you think of everyone as fit healthy and mobile.

Anyone with disabled people, chronically ill people, terminally ill people and elderly people in their own lives knows it’s not that simple.

Most of us don’t have people physically weakened by famine in our own lives but it doesn’t take Einstein to know this is a problem too. And from NGOs we know there’s a lot of parentless children and a disproportionate number of child amputees in the mix as well.

If your response to this many civillians being killed is “it’s their fault for not getting away” you need to examine your logic, I think.

Reddit also reported a 37% increase in daily active users. I think we all know who those are.

I find this comment disturbing in so many ways. I think an example that really sums up what’s wrong with it is

Israel unsurprisingly puts the safety of their soldiers above the concerns of local farmers.

“Concerns of local farmers” isn’t the main issue with crop destruction. Famine and starvation are.

And the binary between being blown up by ieds and destroying fields is a false dichotomy. A better way of phrasing it would be:

Israel puts expediency above the lives of local civilians.

The UN doesn’t declare famine until 30% of a population’s children are displaying physical signs such as muscle wasting. This is really serious. We saw it two years ago with the deliberate famine in Ethiopia and now we’re seeing it in Gaza.

Every single nation on Earth would have reacted to this with a full-on war

I find it a bit bizarre that people keep using this talking point when there’s ample evidence that other countries do not react to terrorism by slaughtering thousands of innocent civilians.

Many countries have shown themselves able to respect international law. Britain for example managed not to massacre the children of Ireland en masse when it was dealing with the IRA.

“Think of the children” as a phrase is meant to satirize the fallacious appeals of “moral panic” arguments in support of conservative social values.

Your idea that it also covers arguments for literally not killing children is odd. There’s nothing necessarily fallacious about singling out children as a subset that it’s especially important to avoid killing.

In this case half the civilians are children and they are being killed, so it’s a reasonable thing to want to stop.

The implication of your use of the phrase here is that no one should consider children’s wellbeing even when real harm is being done to them. I find that idea dystopian and inhumane.

Worth noting that for the UN to declare famine:

• at least 20% of the adults have to be experiencing severe hunger and

• at least 30% of the children have muscle wasting and/or stunted growth.

This. Also I’m pretty sure they were trained on the turnitin.com corpus so they waffle a lot. They’re incapable of making a point without sounding like someone who loves the sound of their own voice.