Should have been a black mark on his record.

bonk go to horny jail

I think it’s because it’s an unapologetic vertical mouse. Most others are just slanted mice. Note that the furst couple days might be slow because you have to adjust to using your arm that way. I got this one in uni because my wrist just didn’t like being flat, and I used computers a lot. This one matches my resting position really well, and the wrist rest means I’m not sliding the side of my hand all over the desk.

I have a couple of these and like them: https://www.amazon.com/J-Tech-Digital-V628-Adjustable-Sensitivity/dp/B0759V6FZC

On the contrary, there is a lot of professional software that doesn’t run on Windows!

… battery heaters and block heaters are a thing for ICE too though?

For the people / businesses who book these flights.

FYI: there is actually an XKCD font if you want to match the original more closely. https://github.com/ipython/xkcd-font

It takes a while to gather the data, new areas all the time.

No, the plant is full of primary batteries! 4.2 million AA cells!

I’m surprised no one has mentioned Piwigo yet.

Ah, perhaps my source was off. Thanks for the additional data.

But looking at it another way, nuclear is less than twice coal. Estimating the cost of that georgia plant would put it at $16-17B, so those overruns would be atypical.

But my main point on cost is that government investment has been lacking in nuclear compared to renewables: https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertbryce/2021/12/27/why-is-solar-energy-getting-250-times-more-in-federal-tax-credits-than-nuclear/?sh=4a783c3221cf

Without investment, it’s going to stay just as expensive. And the main regulating body not having a mandate to develop the technology has just been holding us back.

A coal power plant is rougly the same cost per GW as solar or wind, doesn’t mean we should build more of them. I agree it’s expensive, but so were solar and wind a couple decades ago. Government investment helped research, development, scaling up - imagine if that had been done in the '80s, we wouldn’t be building natural gas plants right now.

Burying it in the ground with no considerations for leachants is not what nuclear disposal is.

Nuclear is the most regulated one. Start requiring full recycling / disposal of solar or wind and how expensive do they get?

Hydro is best as a giant battery bank, and pairs quite well with nuclear.

They’ve had to keep upgrading them - the percentage of nuclear is the same, but no new plants have been built, so that extra power has come from research on how close to the red line they can actually run.

Try breaking it down by county.

The reason it’s hard to find is because they should be down most of the time. In sudden turbulence, even if you’re wearing a seatbelt, they keep you from spilling out into the aisle.

Also be aware that people walking by, the food cart, etc. can cause it to suddenly slap back down.

I mean Japan it this way with USA / Korea, and China probably as well? USA doesn’t really learn Asian history enough to get the backstory.