No. That is orange Jesus.

Dr. E?

In your case: no need for a fw if you can trust your local network.

Generally: services can have bugs - reverse proxy them. Not everybody needs to access the service - limit access with a firewall. Limit brute-force/ word-list attempts - MFA / fail2ban.

You could also move the TV closer to the sofa.

If one must emphasize that the cheso is indeed cheesy, I would be suspicious.

Any displayport source can (per DP standard) deliver HDMI, you just need a dp->hdmi adapter or cable. An explanatory article from 2008 translated via google.

The other way around is harder to achieve but works, too (needs an active adapter to convert the signal).

Accountability of a human decision maker is the way to go. Agreed.

I see the danger when the accountant’s job asks for high throughput which enforces fast decision making and the tool (llm) offers fast and easy decisions. What is the accountant going to do, if (s)he just sees cases instead of people and fates?

They replaced the training data with an evaluator. (which rates the LLMs output for training?) Interesting, thanks.

Edit: this reminds me of the self evolving (virtual) robot problem, a robot which is rated by an external moderator and improves over time. I.e.: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231221003982

An LLM cannot think like you and I. it’s not able to solve entirely new problems. And it doesn’t have a concept of the world - it paints hands without knowing what a hand does.

It is a system which learns the rules of something by means of reinforcement learning to tune the coefficients of its heap of linear equations. It is better than a human in its area. I guess it can be good for tedious, repetitive tasks. Nevertheless it is just a huge coefficient matrix.

But it can only reproduce what is in the training data - you need lots of already solved examples in the training data. It doesn’t work for entirely new problems.

(that’s also the reason, why LLMs don’t give good answers to questions about specialized niche topics. When there are just one or two studies, there just isn’t enough training data for the LLM.)

The right tool for the right job. It’s not intelligent, it is just trained. It all boils down to stochastic.

And then there is the ecological aspect…
Or sometimes the moral aspect, if it is used to manage someone’s “fate” in application processing. And it might be trained to be racist or misogynist if you use the wrong training data.

Yes.

It should be: https://events.ccc.de/congress/2024/infos/startpage.html

The streaming page is fine though. ( https://media.ccc.de/c/38c3 )

Thanks. That makes sense to me.

Ah. They are profitable through premium accounts? Impressive.

The app is free. What do they sell?

Monetization. Tumbleweed content-wise. Some content producers make content for money.

Media reach: Content is stored, where the consumers look for it.

My first HDD had a capacity of 42MB. Still a short way to go until factor 10⁶.

When I look at the default list of trusted CAs in my browser, I get the feeling that certificate lifetimes isn’t the biggest issue with server certificates.

Block? No.

Ask public law institutions to not use it. Maybe.

You know. In ancient times, they had radios with tuners - and scales for visual feedback. ;)

In the game, they use it as a plot device for the communication with other… planes of reality? I liked the idea in part 1.

Oxenfree 2 is out? I need to take a look. Thanks.