

A leaf node is a vector to spam/attack the rest of the network. The network is only as strong as its weakest node.
Edit: i.e. an instance owner with a weak shell password
A leaf node is a vector to spam/attack the rest of the network. The network is only as strong as its weakest node.
Edit: i.e. an instance owner with a weak shell password
You misunderstood. I said the public availability does not grant OpenAI the right to use content improperly. The authors should also sue the party who leaked their works without license.
I’d love to know the source for the works that were allegedly violated. Presuming OpenAI didn’t scour zlib/libgen for the books, where on the net were the cleartext copies of their writings stored?
Being stored in cleartext publicly on the net does not grant OpenAI the right to misuse their art, but the authors need to go after the entity that leaked their works.
Luckett is an unrepentant worm. Chapman is to be commended for calling him out.
Keep it civil.
My distrust is in Google, not technology.
You trust Google to use quantum tech for purely scientific pursuits?
This device should be seized and destroyed. Google have constructed a weapon.
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ansible
I’m unaware of hardware requirements, but specs will entirely depend on how many users and communities (local and federated) an instance has. I’m running on a very small VPS with no current desire to add users.
Server owners have discretion over community creation and federation. If you create your own instance, you’re totally free to have whatever communities you like.
Alternatively, on the left is what the users originally asked for, a double cheeseburger. On the right, representing what is eventually delivered after changes in requirements are incorporated, is a deep dish pizza.