booty [he/him]

spooky green line stay away

If you write something, you own the copyright, period. There’s no registration process or anything like that. If you made it, it’s yours, legally. And the only process involved to exercise your legal rights would just be proving that you’re actually the one who made it.

Of course, none of that makes it certain that no one will claim it as their own or use it for something you don’t want. As a general rule, just assume that anything you don’t want used in a way you don’t like simply shouldn’t be put out into the public at all, regardless of what kind of license you package with it. If you’re an average person and not a billionaire good luck exercising any kind of legal rights for intangible stuff like written words.

It is generally a good idea to include with anything you put out there some kind of license, which could be as simple as a .txt file that says “Made by [name], free to use for xyz purposes with abc caveats”

For a book stuff like that can go into the first or last couple pages that usually include all sorts of random boring information and publisher credits and whatnot

I read all my books on the clock

You should edit out the racism from your title.

not really here to debate about it, this is a closed issue here. the post as is will be removed as soon as a mod notices the racist title

you should edit the racism out of the title

Now that I’m rereading this, how can one look at the act of killing and compare it to picking fucking fruit?

The point I’m making is a grammatical one. The premise of your argument is that the term “killing” without a subject implies a blanket application of all forms of killing, whether they be for necessity or pleasure, of nazis or puppies. The premise of my argument is that the term “killing” without a subject is nonsense. There’s no such thing as killing without a subject.

It is like “picking fruit” only in the sense that “picking” requires a subject. You can’t speak on all “picking” because that doesn’t exist. You can pick clothes, pick fruit, pick up cute boys, whatever. To suggest that there is some nebulous concept of “picking” is just as logical as to suggest the existence of some nebulous concept of “killing.” You can’t pick without a thing to pick, you can’t kill without someone to kill. It is the someone which determines whether the killing is good or bad.

Removed by mod

Killing cannot be a verb on its own, it requires a subject. There’s no such thing as just “killing” on its own, there is always someone on the other side being killed. When that someone is nazis, killing is something to be proud of.

Nah, killing nazis is something to be proud of.

Seems like this person’s main problem is that they went to lemmy.world, which does basically seem like a collection of all the worst redditors.

Many people that download Firefox are doing so to escape google, and if they are not born as cyber security experts they may download Firefox and continue with no real improvement to their privacy.

Uh, if they’re already downloading an entire browser for the purpose of escaping google, they can also do the extremely minimal research required to learn how to actually get decent privacy from doing so. In fact, whoever told them about Firefox being better in this regard probably already explained this stuff to them

you are a fucking fool. you would jump off a bridge if the democratic party told you to, and then you’d crawl back with broken legs and do it a second time.

communists not blocked, we win again

I sure fucking did buddy, but I’m not the one who made the mess

you come into my house, drop lib shit all over the floor and then dare talk down to me? I’ll have you know that I

I’d tell you to read a book but I don’t think libs are capable

deleted by creator

Authoritarianism isn’t a real thing and your belief that it is cements you as a

lib