• 0 Posts
  • 113 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 25th, 2023

help-circle


  • bjorney@lemmy.catoTechnology@lemmy.worldServo vs Ladybird.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    If I was the maintainer, I too would probably reject the PR because it didn’t remove the gender entirely.

    Cool, but that isn’t what happened here. The PR was closed immediately because the maintainer considered using gender neutral pronouns “personal politics” - he had ample opportunity to clarify his stance, or simply comment ‘resubmit in passive voice’, but he didn’t. Clearly the problem wasn’t the active voice, it was the summary of the change, because when that exact same PR was re-submitted much later with a commit message of ‘Fix some minor ESL grammar issues’, it was accepted with no discussion

    As an aside, I absolutely disagree with the use of passive voice. It’s more verbose, and harder for the reader to comprehend. It’s why every style guide (APA, Chicago, IEEE, etc) recommends sticking to active voice, especially in the context of ‘doing things’.


  • bjorney@lemmy.catoTechnology@lemmy.worldServo vs Ladybird.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    If goes against established norms here

    What’s the established norm here. All people compiling software by source are male?

    he said politically motivated changes aren’t welcome

    What’s politically motivated about changing “he” to “they”. As you said, gender doesn’t apply here, so the neutral word is literally preferable.


  • bjorney@lemmy.catoTechnology@lemmy.worldServo vs Ladybird.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    Yes, I’m sure that PR would have been accepted instead /s

    But you’re right, it doesn’t matter at all, the reasonable thing to do would have been for the guy to spend 3 seconds clicking the accept and merge button, or 6 seconds making your change. instead he wrote a comment stating that inclusive language has no place in his project







  • You are missing the point, it’s not “4.5 hours a week of work” vs “absolutely nothing”, it’s 4.5 hours of work vs however long to have to work to pay for the ingredients, plus the time to make the food. If I spend an hour meal prepping and it takes me an hour and a half to pay for the ingredients, eating out at lunch only costs me 2 additional hours of my time, not 4.5

    I also don’t know what meal you are preparing where chopping veggies, searing meat, packaging and cleaning up afterwards only takes 20 minutes. Even making chili, which is the prototypical “throw everything in a pot” recipe takes me north of an hour when all is said and done