At which point do political ideologies get shaped by “advertiser friendliness”?

Welcome to topology where your mug is a toroid and the orientation matters a lot.

Since bread cannot be attached to language in any orientable way, you are right: It ain’t a sandwich, it’s a salad!

Change to Linux on main PC when?

Same here. Maybe post it on feddit.de/c/blogging under a different account? :)

They are a lot more efficient in their class and might convince some ICE drivers to switch. Their range tends to be quite good. Unfortunately they have drawbacks:

• They require a very large battery. If you don’t find >150kW chargers, you’ll be waiting a long time
• More batteries per car = worse environmental impact from production
• Road degradation grows by the fourth power w.r.t. vehicle weight. The big batteries make electric SUVs very heavy
• SUVs are more dangerous for pedestrians due to their size
• In a crash SUVs deliver much more energy, killing more people.

I second this. Drove my Zoe through rain, snow and ice, never had any problem or even thought about with water ingress.

Trade Offer:

You receive: Alligators, Meth

You Give: Debt, Mafia

I don’t get it. People are working for free to add a feature to your product which might move more people to buy said product. Make users who use external features acknowledge some waiver that your company is not responsible for damage. If it turns out to be really good, you can fork it, hire the original inventor and turn it into a paid product. Isn’t that a risk-free win? Am I missing something?

… uh, why?

Remember people: Most alternative browsers are chormium under the hood! Not Firefox though :)

Commie: Never thought I’d die fighting side by side with a Neo-Nazi.

Nazi: What about side by side with a temporary political ally to seize power?

Commie: Aye. I could do that.

Removal of all benefits of civilization to… own the libs?

LISP be like: “There is an error here in this wierd code I just generated and which you never saw before. Wanna hotfix it and try again?”

Note to self: Become a bridge trader.

One thing I don’t get: How were people convinced that an entry in a blockchain somehow results in ownership. People understand ownership and its limits: They lock their bikes when they leave them somewhere, because if there is no enforcement you can lose property. The NFT scammers never mentioned enforcement once, yet somehow you “owned” some ape picture. How did that happen?

I don’t get it. One the one hand people who get behind this kind of article would jump at the change to tell women to “make them a sandwich”. Now that it’s happening… it’s a problem. Wat?

We saw the mass adoption of the internet, which before was mostly used by a small group of techies. Now we might be heading to a split: The mass walled garden and a separate smaller but free internet.

Yes. But you are arguing against lots of social programming, cultural expectations and religious backgrounds. It’s hard.

I think he tried knocking down the Ukrainian kid’s sandcastle and it did not go to well.