• 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle



  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlNo thanks China!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Id be surprised if all admins of every instance that’s federated with Lemmy are all on the same page, let alone looking for narrative driven bots.

    I see “Ukrainian combat footage” with hundreds of upvotes and no comments, there was also an article speaking positively about facebook that had lots of upvotes and no comments (it’s in my history of you look, because I commented lol) - those look like red flags to me











  • Did you read that link you posted? Lmao

    If you get past the first paragraph, suddenly there’s really no praising and they talk about how bad health care is in Cuba and how many try to defect as they are forced into horrible conditions.

    From that article:

    “He said, “We were placed in slums with a high level of violence, under constant monitoring by the Bolivarian brigades [political police], who are supposed to offer protection but also report any suspicious activities and assure that we carry out our `revolutionary’ duty, indoctrinating our patients to vote for Chávez. If we refuse to do so we are sent back to Cuba.””





  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldTitle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but I’d rather not have the mods remove anything - it’s the ol’ “how do we fact check the fact checkers” conundrum.

    One instance of an object or subject, can be viewed completely differently relative to your position in space and time. The observations of how something is functioning can be completely different from one observer to another, yet they can both be correct at the same time.

    So how exactly do you tell the truths from the untruths without proving intentional manipulation in the first place?