Lols [they/them]

i can excuse hiring mercenaries to rough a guy up for leaking cards, but using AI art is a step too far!

deleted by creator

you can be annoyed about something someone is doing without making some personal judgement about that someone

if my train is late because the train driver had a heart attack im aware that its not the drivers fault, but im still not going to be thrilled about my luck

this is an extraordinarily terrible title

deleted by creator

spreading child pornography is in fact illegal in most of the world

the options are not in fact committing borderline war crimes or accepting russian rule

and no, dropping cluster bombs are actually the fault of the person dropping cluster bombs

if turning several kids into chunky red paste per russian is just the price youre willing to pay thats one thing, but at least grow a spine and say it with your whole chest instead of shoving off the responsibility on said russians

98% of 13,306 recorded cluster munitions casualties that are registered with Handicap International are civilians, while 27% are children

bombing your own population and its kids to own the russians

no, its still an extremely weird thing to see in the modern age regardless of how common it is

no actually, since the conversation is explicitly about conspiracy to commit murder, arguing that any belief in enforcing participation in society constitutes that is explicitly saying that having laws automatically means killing people

you dont actually get to say ‘violence’ instead of ‘murder’ in a conversation about murder, and then pretend that you arent talking about murder

unless this is you admitting that communism is not actually a conspiracy to commit murder, in which case cool i agree!

being forced to participate in society is called following the laws of the country youre in

am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people? thats a pretty scary thing to believe, and in no way indicative of any particular ideology im sure

its also false, considering the continued existence of countries that have abolished the death penalty entirely

on a side note, can you explain why you moved the goal posts from ‘communists want to kill everyone’ to ‘well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed’ to ‘well having laws means killing people’

If kumbaya is their plan, well, it isn’t going to succeed.

it sure seems like this is less about communists believing that violence is necessary, and more about you believing violence is necessary

actually, you distinctly said ‘every communist ive pushed far enough’, not ‘literally every communist’

heres some that dont agree

im not a communist and my explaining how violence is not a literal part of the definition for communism as it is with fascism is not proselytism

is that what you were doing? trying to get folks to join your cult of fascism?

because regardless or anecdotes, a communist ideal does not by definition necessitate a conspiracy to commit murder

even if not a single pacifist communist existed, and they do, itd still be totally possible to be both a pacifist and a communist

in contrast, violence is a fundamental part of what makes fascism fascism. a fascist party will never be pacifistic, because it would no longer be fascist

you lot are distanced away because you cant behave lol

no, conspiracy to commit murder is not an inherent aspect of communist ideology in the same way that it is integral to fascism