• 5 Posts
  • 42 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • I disagree (a bit at least).

    Debian is just as prone to breaking due to the lack of fallbacks (e.g. Snapper), it just doesn’t break as often because it doesn’t change as much as Arch.
    If you use a minimal/ default install, this won’t happen as easily, but as soon as you customise anything, you get problems.
    Arch can be reliable too, there are many people who have had the same install for years without breaking.

    I would actually recommend Fedora Atomic or other image based distros, e.g. VanillaOS.
    They can be more modern, while being way more reliable thanks to atomic updates/ transactions, complete image rollbacks and the reproducibility.
    They are a dream to use imo!


  • You can still install Nix (package manager) on Atomic, on uBlue, it even comes pre-installed afaik.

    And also, there’s Distrobox, which is totally enough if you prefer package managers over Flatpaks.
    I personally like the “reliance” on Flatpaks. I think it reduces the fragmentation and makes it easier for devs, but that’s just my opinion. Do as you prefer.


  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldhell yeah mint
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t like apt too as much. But, interface-wise, you can make it way better with Nala, which is a frontend for it.

    NixOS is too complicated and demanding for most users, who aren’t programmers or hobbyists, imo.
    I prefer Fedora Atomic. It has the same pros (unbreakable, highly configurable with universal-blue.org, etc.) but feels way more user friendly.
    I use it with Distrobox on top, so I can use my package manager/ distro of choice (turned out to be Arch btw) on a extremely reliable system.

    For your case, you can replicate Mint by just installing the Cinnamon image from uBlue and applying some minimal tweaks.
    Then you get the user friendliness from Mint with the flexibility and unbreakability from NixOS. Do you like the idea? Just in case you get annoyed by NixOS in the future 🙃







  • Debian is community run, which often means all changes and features get implemented because the community wants that, not some corporation. One notable example of that is Snap.

    Also, I found (minimal install) Debian a bit more minimalist than Ubuntu server, which is great imo. I just want the bare minimum for my services to work, and pretty much the only thing I expect from my server to have is SSH and Docker.









  • My recommendation would be to use Logseq.

    It’s similar to Obsidian (“Second Brain”/ PKM), but with the journal function as backbone.

    It relies heavily on crosslinking, is markdown-based, very efficient and a joy to use once you “got” it, and supports a hell lot of features, including TODO, plugins, a knowledge network (“graph view”) and much more.

    I use it for everything (external brain) and pretty much never loved a piece of software this much!
    It sounds like it is THE tool you’re searching for!



  • Because containers (Distrobox, Flatpak, etc.) are bae.
    You can read my post I made a while ago for more information: https://feddit.de/post/8234416

    Once you “get” image based distros, you probably never want to go back. Traditional distros just feel… off now for me.
    Containerisation is the biggest strength in Linux, we use it all the time on servers, so why not on the desktop?
    Atomic OSs just make more sense for me, not only because of security/ bug/ whatever reasons, no, also because they feel simpler and are pretty convenient and robust.