

Wrong again, sparky.
Wrong again, sparky.
Your performative concern for animals is noted.
Don’t forget the horrors it’ll produce from absorbing the Dwarf Fortress subreddits.
Except they literally don’t. Human memory doesn’t retain an exact copy of things. Very good isn’t the same as exactly. And human beings can’t grab everything they see and instantly use it.
Previous wrongs don’t make this instance right.
The problem is that a human doesn’t absorb exact copies of what it learns from, and fair use doesn’t include taking entire works, shoving them in a box, and shaking it until something you want comes out.
The difference here is that a child can’t absorb and suddenly use massive amounts of data.
How hard it is doesn’t matter. If you can’t compensate people for using their work, or excluding work people don’t want users, you just don’t get that data.
There’s plenty of stuff in the public domain.
It’s not using a computer that’s the problem. The issue is that generative AI scrapes the entire internet to feed its model without compensating, or even asking, creators for using their work.
The one where my mom never had cancer.
Lisa needs braces
It’s Space Karen’s new name, and logo, for Twitter.
No, but there are things that will make this seem pleasant by comparison.
I really confused the person monitoring the self checkout on one occasion several years ago.
I paid with cash, and was supposed to get something like $2.17 back in change. The machine gave me the seventeen cents just fine, but instead of two dollar bills, I got a one and a ten.
It took a couple tries to get the worker to understand that the machine gave me too much back.
No, Godzilla, it needs a flared base.
The part where it gives random results of varying quality, sparky.