I read this as “X is the platform that shares all the information that doesn’t follow our authoritarian agendas”.
Good. That means X is serving its purpose: informing people of all available opinions in a crazy, leftist, authoritarian world that’s indicting speech.
No one owns a monopoly on the truth.
As long as I see a bunch of human-hating, ignorant bunch of teenagers and bots playing with their heads, I’m on it ;-)
This is the dream of human haters. Me, on the other hand, I would say we would be colonizing the galaxy, right after we tell every communist to shut the fuck up, so that we can continue building our civilization without lazy fatties asking for free stuff.
Angry? Dude I’m laughing my ass off! You’re complaining all the time on Lemmy how you’re broke and are failures. It’s you who are angry, and I’m laughing at you day and night! I enjoy watching you falling, broke and powerless. Lovely! Keep up your ignorance, entitlement and dumb ideologies, and my children will step on yours like cockroaches with wealth and power. I love it!
You wanna cry a little more that you can’t buy a home? Go ahead! But God forbid you read a book and learn what yield curve control means… hahahahahahaha!
So central banks are printing money left and right, controlling the market winners, controlling interest rates, short and long ends of the yield curve, inflation, and my testicles, and you call it a “free” market?
Genuine question. Are you stupid genetically or did you learn being stupid from your environment like every teenager around here who don’t understand shit in the economy?
Case in point… Doom is not invented, it’s discovered!
OK, teenager.
You forgot “I wonder why fuel prices are sky rocketing even though we voted a president that promised to fight fossil fuels for climate bullshit”
Enjoy! I’ll be here laughing.
Or people who have better things to do.
OK, teenager.
I have a PhD in physics. I spent half of my life in labs doing measurements and calculating systematic and statistical errors on them in an experiment that collects data over years to get a single number. A good chunk of my thesis is on how to properly estimate errors in measurements that are years long. I have even worked with complicated concepts like propagating errors through mathematical models to minimize them.
No you don’t have measurements to validate anything. You have “this line goes up, this other line goes up, and we think we can explain it with green house nonsense, and hence the correlation coefficient is 1.00000”, and hence we caused it. You think I haven’t seen this nonsense? 99.99% of the people have no idea what the hell they’re talking about.
Yes, earth went hotter and colder million times before. This invalidates climate change. We have no proof, not even statistical, that humans caused anything. We only have political agendas and research groups who get funding if they agree to come to that result. And we have dumb people who don’t understand basic logic or can add two fractions parrot what the television says in fear.
Temperature going up over time? Over how long? 100 years compared to billions, the age of earth? Do you even understand basic statistics to calculate the confidence in such a measurement?
All the bullshit you’re parroting from television, like green house effect, is at best circumstantial evidence but it’s not proof, and it’s evidence with negligible confidence due to the huge error margin mentioned earlier. Even worse, it’s not even evidence because of the oldest rule in the book “correlation doesn’t imply causation”, yet somehow it’s still science when basic logic is broken to support a political agenda propped by ignorant people who know nothing in math and teenagers who still don’t know the difference between integrals and derivatives and cry that “math is hard”.
I hate to break it to you, but people who can’t calculate the standard error on measurements shouldn’t open their mouths about science, and certainly shouldn’t ask us to surrender all our power and money to corrupt politicians for a fictitious goal.
I’m bored of hearing all this politicized nonsense. Maybe go find a book of someone who disagrees with your opinion and learn something outside of what you learned on television.
I don’t think I’ll respond if you bore me again.
Over the history of earth, much worse happened. Statistically, this change is nothing over the millions and even billions of years.
I maintain that nothing is changing, and we don’t even have close to enough data to judge an earth that’s 4.5 billion years old to know that anything is changing because of us, and that paying politicians more is the answer.
Just remember in 20 years when nothing changes and life proceeds as normal. No one will care what you think then because the robbery will have been done.
And people wonder how I know that Lemmy is all teenagers.
Just to cover all bases. Maybe you’re just too late due to your brainwashing making you not realize how delusional you are? But of course that’s not the case, because you’re the Super Smartest Guy™, and everyone else is so stupid to not understand your true genius.
Congrats… I guess?
You sound like a teenager. We can talk after you finish high school.
I don’t disagree with you. My contention is that the assumption of “uncorrupt power” is just naive and short term, at best.
What kind of logic is that? You’re confusing “taking care of you” with “making trades”. My life doesn’t depend on one person making clothes for me. I can switch them whenever I want, unlike your monopoly government, or Google for that matter.
Is that you… Windows 95?