• blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everyone just saying jobs they dont like, or that they have ethical qualms about, but ignoring “regardless of pay” - and I don’t believe you.

    Just imagine the salary for the position is $500m per year. At a certain point, you would be able to quit the job with plenty of money for the rest of your life after working for a very short period of time, or else you would be able to use the money to make more good in the world than the harm done by your labor.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you have a skill set someone is offering $500k for, someone less shitty is going to be offering at least $400k. So you’re not giving up $500k, you’re giving up $100k or 20%. I’ve taken bigger pay cuts than that in exchange for increased job satisfaction.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Every other job will only hire you for a normal wage that you would make in the real world.

        The point of the exercise is to grapple with an ethical quandry, not to sidestep it.

        • bus_factor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not particularly interested in an exercise which is completely irrelevant to real-world scenarios. In the real world your choice would look more similar to my example, so that is the more relevant hypothetical.

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If we cared about the real world, we’d be actually doing something, rather than just talking.