1783 cases, 137 of which with a changed view after interaction.

reddit admin also answering at 15:00

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      “The researchers argue that psychological manipulation of OPs on this sub is justified because the lack of existing field experiments constitutes an unacceptable gap in the body of knowledge”

      They were just convinced the end justified the means. Ethics be damned, there’s knowledge to pursue

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    137 out of 1783 doesn’t sound conclusive at all.

    ESPECIALLY when you consider that the results are skewed to the point of uselessness by the fact that it’s against the subreddit’s rules to accuse anyone of arguing in bad faith and/or being a bot.

    It’s almost the equivalent of a study concluding that there’s no LGBTQ+ people in Uganda or Russia because they couldn’t get anyone to publicly identify as such in a country where it’s illegal for LGBTQ+ people to exist.

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    How did they verify their bots are talking to humans? Have them solve captcha? You’re running a science experiment on fucking Reddit. GTFO