

That might be a viable option.


That might be a viable option.


Copyright should not apply to a historic record, but things don’t become historic record upon creation, but sometime after. However, you can’t have a historic record if it isn’t recording history as it happens so…once enough time passes to make a historic record case versus copyright how do you add back the stuff that wasn’t recorded at the time?
The removal of this content is itself now historic record so tag the missing information and why there is a black hole where the record should be. Digital history, and thus history, as swiss cheese because the value of copyright matters more than accuracy of the history of the digital age itself. It is a tragedy to the future that we can’t record reality because someone claims they own it…
We are a stupid, stupid species.
I refuse to automatically assume you cared about your husband, so your position as a widow means nothing to your argument, which doesn’t actually exists at all without that assumption.


Books are less valuable than a record of the state of the digital space, through time.


If they can, they will. That’s the only rule you need to know about business and politics.
Idk, but one more and the circle closes, the ritual is complete.


Wait till it shapes beliefs and behaviors in service to AIs owners and we all end up devoted to whichever corporate tribe we used.


And does ChatGPT make the situation better or worse?
That’s what the magic numbers say makes more monies.


“I just want you to listen, stop trying to fix it!”
To the extent they are able, relative to their need. You are clearly far more able than a lot of parents who aren’t well off, like you.


And none of those shareholders vote along lines that are good for society. You’re going to probably kill us all someday with some bullshit business decision or another, directly or otherwise.


It is a euphemism for high tech, particularly for the infotech industry, most of which started in silicon valley and is where many startups still come from. eBay, western digital, Nvidia, hp, adobe, PayPal,oracle, and, Intel, Cisco, meta, Google, Apple etc. They all come from there and bring the mantra with them in their corporate culture which is now common across industries, particularly info Tech.


Move fast and break things…the mantra of silicon valley.


Diversity is a strength when things go bad.


It’s a layer of dependency and a barrier to entry. AI is not a servant to our interests but censor, preacher and teacher and cult speaker who works for psychopaths who would happily re-enslave the human race.


K but can we just keep using windows 10 anyways?


If you ask ChatGPT, it says it’s guidelines include not giving the impression it’s a human. But if you ask it be less human because it is confusing you, it says that would break the guidelines.
It does call into question the motive of the archive and it’s financial viability to pivot to doing that.