The comment you replied to did not dispute that. They said Windows games run on Windows, not that they don’t run on Linux.

There are already ads in Google Maps, there is nothing for them to follow.

Do you have any source on this? I have never seen a similar article about phones sending a 3D map of your home to the manufacturer.

Against? Vaccines make you suspectible to 5G, which is why they emphasize they didn’t do it and yet are in danger.

What’s black mirror-like about better screens?

What does that have to do with the article though? The technology in question is not intended for implants.

What are you guys talking about, what eyeball, what computer in a lens? This is supposed to be a new display technology for smart glasses or VR headsets.

And yet FUTO clearly attempt to keep up a false image of being the good guys, which doesn’t seem like openly being the bad guys.

By that logic the word “openly” is meaningless.

says he isn’t a thief

Well that’s the entire issue, isn’t it? If he says he isn’t a thief, then he’s a thief who clearly isn’t open about it. Just like Mike isn’t openly a nazi, he’s just a nazi who’s lying about not being one.

Exactly my point, and yet the commenter claims FUTO do that, even though they obviously aren’t, because who would.

Try Ente Photos, I like it more.

Do words mean anything anymore? That is an argument for them being fascists. But how are they “openly” fascist? Where is their statement, where they openly state “we are fascists”?

Because they might be, but I don’t think they ever openly said so.

Any primary school math textbook will do as a source and tell you not all rectangles are squares, even if a square is a rectangle.

I’m not sure what your point is. There are many people that like AI but don’t like Copilot. So a statistic of people liking AI is not equivalent to a statistic of people liking Copilot. That’s like saying people love my baking because people like baking in general, even though I didn’t ask anyone about my baking in particular.

There is a vast difference between people using/liking AI and people using/liking Copilot.

The marketing is more for the submersible camera that survived, just like it was designed to do, the SD card was just inside the camera and no water even touched it. I don’t think the SD card should be getting any credit.

So what? Them driving is not relevant to this at all. The idea is that the cars they sell become illegal.

It could be a feature of web browsers. Images would get some icon indicating the valid signature, just like browsers already show the padlock icon indicating a valid certificate. So everybody would be seeing the verification.

But I don’t think it’s a good idea, for other reasons.

I’ve never seen that happen, in fact bad reviews about problems in my apps keep being shown at the top of the list, even though the problems were solved years ago and the reviews are about a very early version.