https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/

I simply don’t have the stomach for rape or genocide. My reason tells me these things might in some future be be necessary, if there were a contrived situation in which a madman asked me to rape someone or he’ll nuke the world. But my “ick factor” disagrees, and would not permit me to act as I reason. Fortunately, I cannot see the likelihood of such a situation in my lifetime. I have a reasonable certainty of upholding my principles if I always condemn those who rape or genocide. Well, as long as I don’t get it into my head that CNC is rape.

I do not understand why you are so opposed to humility. I don’t know everything. I have access to no fundamental great truth of the world. I recognise my feelings on right and wrong to be just that - feelings. You find the smallness of my ego offensive. This doesn’t make any sense to me.

I think all rape is bad, due to my utilitarianism, and my conviction that rape is a deeply violating act which causes suffering that cannot be made up for

Now, explain your ancap objectivist viewpoint.

You’re a moral objectivist, too? Shall I start calling you Ms Rand?

You don’t need objective truth to hate Trump. You can just subjectively believe rape is wrong. Are you saying you don’t have a subjective opinion against rape?

The point of science isn’t to produce data. It’s to produce conclusions. The conclusions will be different.

Objective in the second way means that people performing the same actions will get the same results regardless of cultural or personal biases.

I guarantee you that if a Christian and an atheist are given the same prayer healing treatment, the Christian will see a stronger placebo effect. Try the same experiment on the efficacy of faith healing in Afghanistan and in Sweden, you’ll get different results.

Are you saying the Trump administration are poststructuralists who believe everything is open to interpretation?

But science is “objective” to the extent that experiments are repeatable by any any given person following the same methodology will be the same results.

No, the beliefs of the researcher are a confounding variable in any experiment. This is called observer bias. Most researchers believe in disputed ideas like personhood, spacetime, and objects, which influence their scientific conclusions. This isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. Science exists within our socially constructed world. A truly objective epistemology would be incomprehensible to us, because we are not objectively perceiving or thinking creatures.

You religious quacks are what’s wrong with science. Worshipping the idea of science instead of using the scientific method as a tool.

questions the objectivity or stability of the various interpretive structures that are posited by structuralism and considers them to be constituted by broader systems of power.

Calling people who disagree with you mentally ill is one of the reasons poststructuralists say you’re oppressing them.

The 4 guy is a lemmy.ml user and the dumb fuck guy has been banned for incivility

There are no undeniable facts. Science doesn’t prove anything objectively, it merely provides evidence to support or reject certain ideas.

“Fellas, is it a fetish to like girls?”

Yeah

Watch this: Luigi is a hero

Yeah having it as well is good. Using only it is inhumane and barbaric.

tbh I had no idea Europe was so racist. Citizenship based on “blood” sounds like something out of the middle ages.

You can spin up your own Bluesky instance

…which is still managed by the Bluesky central server and can’t connect to peer instances without that server.